The IHRA Definition of Anti-Semitism and its Implications: A Complex Debate

The IHRA Definition of Anti-Semitism and its Implications: A Complex Debate

The IHRA Definition of Anti-Semitism and its Implications: A Complex Debate.
 

Michele Piras, former Italian MP and President of the European League of Parliamentarians for Palestine.

 

The IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, in use since January 2005, has sparked intense debate throughout the European Union and other countries worldwide due to its ambiguous formulation and its utilization by pro-Israeli organizations.

According to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, "anti-Semitism" refers to a particular perception of Jews that may manifest as hatred towards them. However, many countries, institutions, and Jewish foundations have rejected this definition, contending that it contradicts Article 11 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, which safeguards freedom of speech. They argue that the definition represents a deliberate attempt to stifle critical positions towards Israeli policies. Nonetheless, it has been adopted by some universities and other institutions.

The consequences of this definition have already been observed. Several instances have emerged in which film producers, intellectuals like Ken Loach, and public events such as the "Falistin Festival" in Italy have been accused of anti-Semitism. This phenomenon has primarily been driven by the use of the IHRA definition.

It is evident that if Israel considers itself the historical Jewish homeland, any effort to challenge the impunity for crimes committed against the Palestinian people may be perceived as anti-Semitism based on this broad definition. Consequently, activists and Members of Parliament advocating for Palestine may face scrutiny. This is one of the key factors contributing to the weakening of the pro-Palestinian movement in Europe and other Western countries, resulting in softer voices, measured language, and an avoidance of discussing the brutality of apartheid.

It is essential to recognize the complexity and sensitivity surrounding the work that must be undertaken in Europe. It is urgent to oppose the adoption of the IHRA definition and strive for a cultural revolution rooted in democratic values and a steadfast commitment to human rights.

While firmly rejecting all forms of racism, it is unacceptable to exploit this issue to undermine democratic guarantees or justify crimes and injustices in any form they may appear, including those committed against the Palestinian people.

Therefore, one of the primary objectives in Europe is to establish a robust institutional network capable of expressing solidarity with those advocating for a free and independent Palestine. This network should also develop effective policies and concrete measures to ensure protection for Palestinians and advance a just peace process, encompassing an end to the occupation, withdrawal of colonization, the right of refugees, and full compliance with international law.

Picked for you

Netanyahu's idea of workable peace excludes Palestinian independence

Netanyahu's idea of workable peace excludes Palestinian independence

Benjamin Netanyahu has always been an open book. Although the Israeli prime minister is skilled at twisting facts and rewriting history when necessary, he has been very clear on his relations with the Palestinians since day one. The US cannot claim that it was taken by surprise with its strategy regarding the Washington-backed peace formula of the two-state solution and the illegal Jewish... Read more